MercadoLibre (MELI) – Munger Quality Rubric Stock Evaluation

View All Stock Evaluations | Evaluation Date: 2026-01-05


How This Company Makes Money

MercadoLibre is Latin America’s dominant e-commerce and fintech ecosystem. The company generates revenue through marketplace transaction fees (59% of revenue), digital payment processing via Mercado Pago (41% of revenue), shipping/logistics services (Mercado Envios), advertising (Mercado Ads), and a rapidly growing credit business offering consumer and merchant loans across 18 Latin American countries.


Table of Contents

  1. Executive Summary Scorecard
  2. Company Overview
  3. Leadership & Board of Directors
  4. Business Model Visual
  5. Dividends & Upcoming Events
  6. Competitor Comparison Summary
  7. Visual Score Summary
  8. Key Graham/Buffett/Munger Quotes Applied
  9. Detailed Analysis
  • Sections A through H
  • Section J: Benjamin Graham Screen
  1. Red Flag Analysis
  2. Critic Review Notes
  3. Source Reliability Summary
  4. Hyperlink Validation
  5. All Citations

Executive Summary Scorecard

CategoryScoreMax%Rating
A. CEO & Management222588%🟢
B. Board of Directors162080%🟢
C. Incentive Structures162080%🟢
D. Regulatory & Political172568%🟡
E. Business Quality & Moat303586%🟢
F. Financial Strength283580%🟢
G. Country & Geopolitical101567%🟡
H. Valuation & Margin of Safety223563%🟡
I. Red Flag Deductions-602 flags
Normalized Score73.8%100%
J. Graham Screen2/7Info❌ FAIL

Munger Verdict: ✅ PASS

Rating Guide: 🟢 = 80%+ | 🟡 = 60-79% | 🔴 = <60% Verdict: ✅ PASS (70%+) | ⚠️ CAUTION (55-69%) | ❌ FAIL (<55%)


People & Governance
A. CEO88%
B. Board80%
C. Incentives80%
Risk Assessment
D. Regulatory68%
G. Geopolitical67%
Business Quality
E. Business/Moat86%
F. Financial80%
Valuation
H. Valuation63%
Final Score
155/210
73.8%
Verdict
✅ PASS
80%+ Excellent 60-79% Good <60% Concern


Company Overview

  • Company: MercadoLibre, Inc.
  • Ticker: MELI
  • Exchange: NASDAQ
  • Industry: E-commerce / Fintech
  • Sector: Consumer Discretionary / Technology
  • Founded: 1999
  • Headquarters: Montevideo, Uruguay (incorporated in Delaware)
  • Employees: ~84,000 (including logistics workforce)
  • Market Cap: $100.06 billion (Jan 2026)
  • FY 2024 Revenue: $20.78 billion

Revenue Breakdown by Segment (FY 2024)

SegmentFY Revenue% of TotalYoY GrowthTrend
Commerce (Marketplace + Shipping)$12.2B59%+48.3%🟢
Fintech (Mercado Pago)$8.6B41%+24.8%🟢
Advertising (Mercado Ads)~$1.0B~5%+37%🟢
Credit Portfolio$6.6B(assets)+74%🟢

Geographic Revenue Mix (2024)

Region% of RevenueTrendNote
Brazil55%🟢Largest market, $5.8B investment
Mexico22%🟢Fastest growing, $3.4B investment
Argentina18%🟡Origin market, currency volatility
Other (Chile, Colombia, Peru, etc.)5%🟢Expansion markets

Leadership & Board of Directors

Executive Leadership

RoleNameNotable Background
Executive Chairman (from Jan 2026)Marcos GalperinFounder, Stanford MBA, Argentina’s richest person
CEO (from Jan 2026)Ariel SzarfsztejnFormer Commerce President, Stanford MBA
CFOMartín de los SantosFormer SVP Credits, Stanford MBA, ex-Goldman Sachs
COODaniel RabinovichExecutive VP, 20+ years at company
President, FintechOsvaldo GiménezMercado Pago leader, fintech pioneer

Board of Directors

RoleNameNotable Background
Executive ChairmanMarcos GalperinFounder since 1999
DirectorNicolas AguzinCEO of Hong Kong Exchanges, ex-JP Morgan
DirectorAndrea PetroniHead at JP Morgan, Globant board member
DirectorRichard SandersPartner at Permira, Allegro.eu director
DirectorSusan L. SegalAmericas Society CEO, Scotiabank director
DirectorMario VázquezGlobant & Despegar board member

Business Model Visual

Value Proposition
E-Commerce Platform
Marketplace
Digital Payments
Mercado Pago
Same/Next Day Delivery
Mercado Envios
Banking & Credit
Fintech Services
Revenue Streams
Fintech/Payments
~25% of Revenue
Shipping (Envios)
~15% of Revenue
Credit Income
~15% of Revenue
Ads + 1P Sales
~10% of Revenue
Customers
100M+ Buyers
Annual Unique
1M+ Sellers
Active Merchants
72M Fintech Users
Monthly Active


Dividends & Upcoming Events

Dividend Status

  • Current Dividend: None (suspended in 2018)
  • Last Dividend: $0.15/share (January 2018)
  • Policy: Reinvesting all earnings into growth

Upcoming Events

EventExpected Date
Q4 2025 EarningsFebruary 24, 2026
New CEO Takes OfficeJanuary 1, 2026 (completed)
Annual Shareholder MeetingJune 2026 (TBD)

Competitor Comparison Summary

CompanyMarket CapTTM RevenueYoY GrowthP/EFocus
MercadoLibre (MELI)$100B$26.2B+37%50xLatAm e-commerce + fintech
Amazon (AMZN)$2.3T$620B+11%45xGlobal e-commerce + cloud
Sea Ltd (SE)$60B$15B+23%35xSEA e-commerce (Shopee)
Nu Holdings (NU)$65B$10B+52%32xLatAm digital banking
PDD Holdings (PDD)$150B$55B+86%10xChina + global (Temu)

Visual Score Summary

Category
Score
Progress
%
A. CEO & Management
22/25
88.0%
B. Board of Directors
16/20
80.0%
C. Incentive Structures
16/20
80.0%
D. Regulatory & Political
17/25
68.0%
E. Business Quality & Moat
30/35
86.0%
F. Financial Strength
28/35
80.0%
G. Country & Geopolitical
10/15
67.0%
H. Valuation & Margin of Safety
22/35
63.0%
RAW SUBTOTAL
161/210
77.0%
TOTAL ✅
155/210
73.8%

Key Graham/Buffett/Munger Quotes Applied

“A great business at a fair price is superior to a fair business at a great price.” — Charlie Munger

MercadoLibre exemplifies this principle: a dominant business with strong moats, though not trading at a deep discount.

“In business, I look for economic castles protected by unbreachable moats.” — Warren Buffett

MELI’s integrated ecosystem (marketplace + payments + logistics + credit) creates a powerful flywheel that competitors struggle to replicate.

“Show me the incentive and I’ll show you the outcome.” — Charlie Munger

Management’s significant stock ownership and long-term compensation structure aligns them with shareholders.

“The margin of safety is always dependent on the price paid.” — Benjamin Graham

At 50x P/E, MELI provides limited margin of safety despite its quality, requiring continued execution.


Detailed Analysis

Section A: CEO & Management (Score: 22/25)

“If you’re looking for a manager, you want someone intelligent, energetic, and moral. But if they don’t have the last one, you don’t want the first two.” — Charlie Munger

A1. Integrity & Honesty (5/5)

Marcos Galperin has led MercadoLibre for 26 years with an exemplary reputation. No scandals or ethical lapses on record. Transparent communication with investors and analysts.

  • Evidence: Consistent messaging in earnings calls; praised by analysts for candor (Investor Relations)

A2. Track Record – No Scandals (5/5)

No personal or corporate scandals involving leadership. Clean regulatory history for management team.

  • Evidence: SEC filings show no restatements or enforcement actions (SEC EDGAR)

A3. Capital Allocation Skills (4/5)

Strong track record building Mercado Pago, logistics network, and credit business. However, some concern about heavy investments amid rising competition.

  • Evidence: $5.8B Brazil investment, $3.4B Mexico investment in 2024-2025; ROIC of ~18-25% (MacroTrends)

A4. Transparency & Communication (4/5)

Regular earnings calls, CFO perspectives series, detailed shareholder letters. Some complexity in fintech accounting metrics.

A5. Owner-Orientation (4/5)

Founder Galperin maintains significant ownership (~$1.1B). Leadership transition to internal candidate shows long-term succession planning. No dividends but reinvesting for growth.

  • Evidence: Founder ownership, internal CEO succession (GuruFocus)

Section B: Board of Directors (Score: 16/20)

B1. Business Savvy (4/5)

Board includes executives from JP Morgan, Permira, Hong Kong Exchanges. Deep financial services and technology expertise.

  • Evidence: Nicolas Aguzin (HKEX CEO), Andrea Petroni (JP Morgan), Richard Sanders (Permira) (Board of Directors)

B2. Personal Financial Stake (4/5)

Directors have meaningful ownership. Galperin holds ~$1.1B. Board compensation includes stock-based awards tied to performance.

  • Evidence: Proxy statement disclosures (SEC DEF14A)

B3. Independence (4/5)

Majority of board is independent. ISS Board governance score of 9 (on 1-10 scale, 10 = higher risk) indicates room for improvement.

  • Evidence: ISS Governance QualityScore of 8 overall (Yahoo Finance)

B4. Shareholder Representation (4/5)

Board conducts annual self-assessments. Lead independent director follows up on feedback. Some institutional pressure for improved ESG disclosure.


Section C: Incentive Structures (Score: 16/20)

“Show me the incentive and I’ll show you the outcome.” — Charlie Munger

C1. Compensation Tied to Long-term Performance (4/5)

Long-Term Retention Plan (LTRP) pays out over 6 years with variable components tied to stock price. CEO compensation 96% stock-based.

  • Evidence: 2024 CEO compensation: $13.7M, 95.9% stock-based (Salary.com)

C2. Management Owns Significant Stock (4/5)

Galperin owns ~456,662 shares worth ~$1.1B. However, he sold $188M in stock in August 2024 after share price surge.

C3. Incentives Aligned with Shareholders (4/5)

Annual bonuses tied to net revenues, operating income, TPV, and customer NPS. Company achieved 96.6% of target in 2024.

  • Evidence: Proxy statement compensation discussion (SEC DEF14A)

C4. No Perverse Short-term Incentives (4/5)

No evidence of earnings manipulation or buyback timing games. Minimal buybacks overall ($4M approved in 2025).

  • Evidence: Limited buyback history shows focus on reinvestment (Motley Fool)

Section D: Regulatory & Political Environment (Score: 17/25)

D1. Political/Regulatory Moat Quality (3/5)

Fintech licensing provides some moat but also regulatory burden. Brazil Central Bank increasing capital requirements. No government contracts or monopoly protections.

  • Evidence: Regulatory capital requirements increased to 10.5% from Jan 2025 (SEC Filings)

D2. Government Relationship Sustainability (3/5)

Generally positive relations but subject to changing political winds. Argentina’s new government (Milei) supportive; Brazil and Mexico scrutinizing tech platforms.

  • Evidence: Argentina minister defended MELI against bank complaints (Rest of World)

D3. No Corruption/Bribery Scandals (5/5)

No FCPA violations, bribery investigations, or corruption allegations on record.

  • Evidence: Clean regulatory history in SEC filings

D4. Antitrust Exposure Assessment (3/5)

Active antitrust scrutiny in Mexico (Cofece) and Argentina (MODO complaint). 85% market share with Amazon in Mexico raises concerns.

D5. Regulatory Tailwinds vs Headwinds (3/5)

Mixed environment: Brazil’s PIX benefited Mercado Pago but also created competition. Increased fintech regulation across LatAm.

  • Evidence: Brazil LGPD compliance, increasing regulatory capital requirements (PESTLE Analysis)

Section E: Business Quality & Moat (Score: 30/35)

“The best moats are those that would take decades and billions of dollars to replicate.” — Charlie Munger

E1. Sustainable Competitive Advantage (5/5)

Multiple reinforcing moats: network effects (218M+ users, 1M+ sellers), integrated ecosystem, logistics infrastructure, first-party data, brand recognition.

  • Evidence: 95% of shipments handled by MELI logistics, 50% same/next day delivery (Quartr)

E2. Pricing Power (4/5)

Transaction fees of 16-22% maintained. Advertising take rate growing. However, competing with aggressive pricing from Shopee and Temu.

  • Evidence: Average take rate 18.5% in 2023, ad penetration 2.0% of GMV (Stock Analysis)

E3. High Barriers to Entry (5/5)

Building comparable logistics network would require billions and years. Regulatory licensing for fintech adds barriers. 25+ years of marketplace trust.

E4. Low Threat of Disruption (3/5)

Shopee has overtaken MELI by order volume in Brazil. Temu reached 105M MAUs in LatAm. AI could disrupt advertising business.

  • Evidence: Shopee at 8.5% market share vs MELI’s 12.1% in Brazil, but MELI leads by GMV (Motley Fool)

E5. Industry Structure – Favorable (4/5)

Consolidating market with MELI as clear leader. E-commerce penetration only 12.3% in LatAm vs 19.7% global average – significant runway.

  • Evidence: LatAm e-commerce projected to grow 54% to $232B by 2028 (eMarketer)

E6. Intellectual Property & Brand Value (4/5)

Strong brand recognition across LatAm. Brand Protection Program since 2000. No major patents but proprietary logistics and payment technology.

  • Evidence: Brand Protection Program with machine learning (INTA)

E7. Earnings Predictability & Recurring Revenue (5/5)

Fintech provides recurring transaction revenue. Subscription-like seller relationships. Credit portfolio generates interest income. 27 consecutive quarters of 30%+ growth.


Section F: Financial Strength & Capital Efficiency (Score: 28/35)

“The ideal business earns very high returns on capital and can reinvest at those high returns.” — Warren Buffett

F1. Conservative Debt Levels (3/5)

Debt/Equity of 126%, Net Debt/EBITDA of 0.59x. Total debt of $7.2B but strong cash generation. Debt increased to fund credit portfolio growth.

  • Evidence: Debt-to-equity increased from 62.7% to 126.4% over 5 years (Simply Wall St)

F2. Strong Credit Rating (4/5)

Investment grade from both S&P (BBB-) and Fitch (BBB-). Upgraded in late 2024.

F3. Adequate Cash Reserves (4/5)

$4.0B in cash and short-term investments. Strong free cash flow of $7.1B in 2024. Interest coverage ratio of 47.8x.

F4. No Aggressive Accounting (5/5)

Clean audit opinions. No restatements. Conservative accounting on credit provisions. Transparent about NPL ratios.

  • Evidence: SEC filings show no restatements or enforcement actions (SEC EDGAR)

F5. Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) (4/5)

ROIC of ~18-25% (varies by calculation method), significantly above WACC of ~11%. Value creation confirmed.

  • Evidence: ROIC 25.56% TTM per GuruFocus (GuruFocus)

F6. Free Cash Flow Generation (5/5)

FCF of $7.1B in 2024 (+52% YoY). FCF 5-year CAGR of 60.6%. Excellent cash conversion.

F7. Capital Allocation Track Record (3/5)

Excellent reinvestment in logistics and fintech. Limited shareholder returns (no dividend, minimal buybacks). Growing credit portfolio adds risk.


Section G: Country & Geopolitical Risk (Score: 10/15)

“All I want to know is where I’m going to die, so I’ll never go there.” — Charlie Munger

G1. Operates in Rule-of-Law Jurisdictions (3/5)

Brazil (55% of revenue) and Mexico (22%) are developing markets with improving institutions. Argentina (18%) has higher political/economic volatility.

  • Evidence: Geographic revenue mix from company filings (Statista)

G2. Limited Geopolitical Exposure (3/5)

No direct China/Russia exposure but faces competition from Chinese platforms (Shopee, Temu). Argentina’s economic instability is a recurring risk.

  • Evidence: Argentina peso devaluation of 54% in Dec 2023 impacted results (Bloomberg)

G3. Supply Chain Diversification (4/5)

Primarily a services business with limited physical supply chain. Logistics infrastructure locally developed. Some exposure to device/hardware imports.

  • Evidence: 95% of shipments handled through own logistics network

Section H: Valuation & Margin of Safety (Score: 22/35)

“Price is what you pay, value is what you get.” — Warren Buffett

H1. P/E vs Historical Average (4/5)

Current P/E of 50x is 84% below 10-year average of 319x (heavily skewed by early low-profit years). Near 5-year low of 45x.

H2. P/FCF (Price to Free Cash Flow) (4/5)

EV/FCF of 12.8x is attractive for a high-growth company. P/FCF has declined significantly as FCF expanded.

H3. EV/EBITDA vs Sector (3/5)

EV/EBITDA of 28.5x is above e-commerce sector median but reflects growth premium. Higher than Amazon (~15x) and PDD (~8x).

H4. PEG Ratio (Growth-Adjusted) (4/5)

PEG ratio of 0.97-1.22 suggests reasonable valuation for growth rate. Forward P/E of ~30-40x with 30%+ growth.

H5. P/B Ratio – Graham's Value Test (1/5)

P/B of 16-21x far exceeds Graham’s 1.5x threshold. Not a value stock by Graham standards.

H6. Graham Number vs Current Price (1/5)

Graham Number analysis not applicable – P/B and P/E product far exceeds 22.5 threshold.

  • Evidence: High-growth tech companies rarely meet Graham number criteria

H7. Margin of Safety Assessment (5/5)

Simply Wall St estimates fair value at $2,911 vs current ~$1,967 (32% upside). Analyst consensus price target of $2,872 (+39% upside).


Section J: Benjamin Graham Screen

Graham's 7-Point Defensive Investor Criteria

#CriterionThresholdCurrent ValuePass/Fail
1Adequate SizeMarket Cap > $2B$100B
2Strong Financial ConditionCurrent Ratio ≥ 2.01.17
3Earnings StabilityPositive EPS for 10 consecutive years~8/10 years
4Dividend RecordUninterrupted dividends 20+ years0 years (stopped 2018)
5Earnings GrowthEPS growth ≥ 33% over 10 years>1000%
6Moderate P/E RatioP/E ≤ 1550x
7Moderate P/B RatioP/B ≤ 1.5 OR (P/E × P/B) ≤ 22.5P/B ~17x

Graham Number Analysis

Graham Number Calculation
EPS (TTM):$40.97
Book Value per Share:~$115
Graham Constant:22.5
Graham Number = √(22.5 × EPS × BVPS)
Graham Number = √(22.5 × 40.97 × 115) = $325.57

NCAV Analysis

Net Current Asset Value analysis not applicable – MercadoLibre is not a net-net stock. As a high-growth technology company with significant intangible value, NCAV analysis is not appropriate for this type of business.

Graham Screen Summary

Benjamin Graham Defensive Investor Screen
7-Point Criteria:2/7 PASS
Graham Number Status:SIGNIFICANTLY OVERVALUED
NCAV Test:N/A
Earnings Stability:~8/10 years positive
Dividend Streak:0 years (stopped 2018)


Red Flag Analysis

Governance Red Flags (Max: -35 pts)

Red FlagPresent?DeductionEvidence
Unrealistic promises to investorsN0Consistent achievement of guidance
Excessive CEO compensation (>100x median employee)Y-3CEO $13.7M is high but mostly stock
Related-party transactionsN0None material disclosed
Accounting restatements (last 5 years)N0Clean audit history
High CFO/auditor turnoverN0CFO transition was planned
Reluctance on tough questionsN0Transparent in earnings calls
Corruption/bribery allegations (FCPA)N0No allegations

Financial Red Flags (Max: -21 pts)

Red FlagPresent?DeductionEvidence
High leverage (Debt/EBITDA > 4x)N0Net Debt/EBITDA 0.59x
ROIC below cost of capital (5yr avg)N0ROIC ~18-25% vs WACC ~11%
Declining FCF (3 consecutive years)N0FCF growing 50%+ annually
Net share issuance >2% annually (dilution)N0Minimal dilution
Gross margin declining >500bps (5yr)N0Stable ~47-48%

Business Risk Red Flags (Max: -14 pts)

Red FlagPresent?DeductionEvidence
Customer/supplier concentration >25%N0Highly diversified customer base
Single-country exposure >50% revenueY-3Brazil at 55% of revenue
Revenue decline in 3+ of last 10 yearsN0Consistent growth
Unstable government subsidy dependenceN0No subsidy dependence

Valuation Red Flags (Max: -13 pts)

Red FlagPresent?DeductionEvidence
P/FCF > 40 (or negative FCF)N0EV/FCF 12.8x
Trading >30% above fair value estimateN0Trading below analyst targets

Red Flag Summary

Red Flag Deduction Summary
Governance Red Flags:-3 (max -35)
Financial Red Flags:0 (max -21)
Business Risk Red Flags:-3 (max -14)
Valuation Red Flags:0 (max -13)


Critic Review Notes

Source Reliability Summary

  • Total Sources Used: 45+
  • HIGH Reliability: 38 (84%) – SEC filings, company IR, major financial news
  • MEDIUM Reliability (corroborated): 7 (16%) – Analyst reports, Substack research
  • Sources Removed (LOW): 0
  • Total hyperlinks: 42
  • Links tested: 42
  • Links verified working: 42
  • Links replaced (broken): 0
  • Links removed (no alternative): 0

Score Adjustments

  • Section D (Regulatory): Reduced from initial 19 to 17 due to active antitrust scrutiny in Mexico and Argentina
  • Section G (Geopolitical): Kept at 10 due to Brazil concentration (55%) and Argentina currency risk

Gaps & Limitations

  • Exact insider ownership percentages for all board members not available without premium data access
  • NPL trends beyond 2025 not projected
  • Competitive dynamics with Shopee/Temu evolving rapidly

All Citations

  1. MercadoLibre Investor Relations – Company filings and presentations
  2. SEC EDGAR – MELI Filings – 10-K, 10-Q, DEF 14A
  3. MacroTrends MELI Financials – Historical financial data
  4. Yahoo Finance MELI – Real-time quotes and statistics
  5. Stock Analysis MELI – Metrics and ratios
  6. GuruFocus MELI – ROIC and valuation metrics
  7. Simply Wall St MELI – Valuation analysis
  8. Statista – MercadoLibre Statistics – Market share data
  9. Fitch Ratings – MELI Upgrade – Credit rating
  10. Bloomberg – Galperin Profile – CEO transition
  11. Marcos Galperin Wikipedia – Biography
  12. Rest of World – MELI Antitrust – Argentina regulatory
  13. Digital Commerce 360 – Mexico Antitrust – Mexico regulatory
  14. Motley Fool – MELI Analysis – Competitive analysis
  15. Quartr – MELI Deep Dive – Business model analysis
  16. Glassdoor – MercadoLibre Reviews – Employee feedback
  17. eMarketer – LatAm E-commerce – Market projections
  18. PYMNTS – MELI Antitrust – Argentina complaint
  19. Salary.com – Executive Compensation – CEO pay data
  20. TipRanks – Insider Trading – Insider transactions

Disclaimer: This evaluation is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Investors should conduct their own due diligence before making investment decisions.


Evaluation completed: 2026-01-05

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *