Evaluation Date: 2026-01-14 | ← Back to All Stock Evaluations

---

Key Takeaways: Is PLTR a Quality Investment?

Munger Quality Score: 135/210 (64.3%) – CAUTION

• Top Strength: Business Quality & Moat (83%) — Proprietary ontology technology with $2.5M-$7.5M switching costs
• Key Concern: Valuation (29%) — P/E of 375x with no margin of safety
• Valuation: 375x P/E vs 107x 5-year average — Significantly overvalued at 28x Graham Number
• Key Risk: Extreme valuation combined with $4B+ insider selling in 2024

---

How This Company Makes Money

Palantir Technologies generates recurring revenue through enterprise software subscriptions across two primary segments: Government (55%) and Commercial (45%). The company’s platforms—Gotham for defense and intelligence agencies, Foundry for commercial enterprises, and AIP for enterprise applications—integrate disparate data sources into a unified “ontology” that enables operational decision-making. Revenue concentration in the U.S. (66%) and long-term contracts with high switching costs create predictable, sticky revenue streams with strong capital allocation flexibility.

---

Table of Contents

1. Key Takeaways
2. Executive Summary Scorecard
3. Company Overview
4. Leadership & Board of Directors
5. Business Model Visual
6. Dividends & Upcoming Events
7. PLTR vs Snowflake vs Databricks: Data Analytics Competitor Comparison 2026
8. Visual Score Summary
9. Key Graham/Buffett/Munger Quotes Applied
10. Detailed Analysis
    1. Section A: CEO & Management
    2. Section B: Board of Directors
    3. Section C: Incentive Structures
    4. Section D: Regulatory & Political
    5. Section E: Business Quality & Moat
    6. Section F: Financial Strength
    7. Section G: Geopolitical Risk
    8. Section H: PLTR Intrinsic Value, Valuation & Margin of Safety
    9. Section J: Benjamin Graham Screen
11. Red Flag Analysis
12. Final Verdict: Is PLTR a Quality Buy per Munger’s Rubric?
13. Frequently Asked Questions: PLTR Stock Analysis 2026
14. Related Munger Quality Rubric Evaluations
15. Source Reliability & Citations

---

Executive Summary Scorecard

Category	Score	Max	%	Rating
A. CEO & Management	17	25	68%	🟡
B. Board of Directors	12	20	60%	🟡
C. Incentive Structures	14	20	70%	🟡
D. Regulatory & Political	18	25	72%	🟡
E. Business Quality & Moat	29	35	83%	🟢
F. Financial Strength	28	35	80%	🟢
G. Country & Geopolitical	13	15	87%	🟢
H. Valuation & Margin of Safety	10	35	29%	🔴
Raw Subtotal	141	210
I. Red Flag Deductions	-6	0	2 flags
TOTAL	135	210	64.3%	🟡 CAUTION
J. Graham Screen	1/7	Info	FAIL

Munger Verdict: CAUTION

---

Scorecard Visualization

---

Company Overview

• Company: Palantir Technologies Inc.
• Ticker: PLTR
• Exchange: NASDAQ
• Industry: Business/Productivity Software
• Sector: Technology
• Founded: 2003
• Headquarters: Denver, Colorado, USA
• Employees: ~3,940
• Market Cap: ~$428 billion
• FY 2024 Revenue: $2.87 billion

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

Segment	FY 2024 Revenue	% of Total	YoY Growth	Trend
Government	$1.57B	55%	+28%	🟢
Commercial	$1.30B	45%	+29%	🟢
Total	$2.87B	100%	+29%	🟢

Geographic Revenue Mix

Region	% of Revenue	Trend	Note
United States	66%	🟢	+38% YoY; primary growth driver
United Kingdom	11%	🟢	$305M; second-largest market
Rest of World	23%	🟡	International expansion ongoing

---

Leadership & Board of Directors

Executive Leadership

Role	Name	Notable Background
CEO & Co-Founder	Alexander Karp	PhD in philosophy; The Economist’s 2024 CEO of the Year
Chairman & Co-Founder	Peter Thiel	PayPal co-founder; Founders Fund partner
President & Co-Founder	Stephen Cohen	Stanford CS graduate; technical visionary
CFO & Treasurer	David Glazer	Former Alphabet CFO; financial expertise
CRO & CLO	Ryan Taylor	Harvard Law; Stanford engineering; 14+ years at Palantir
COO & EVP	Shyam Sankar	Technical leader; now a billionaire from stock appreciation

Board of Directors

Name	Role	Independent	Notable Background
Peter Thiel	Chairman	No	Co-founder; holds ~3% shares via voting trust
Alexander Karp	Director	No	CEO since 2003
Stephen Cohen	Director	No	President; technical co-founder
Alexander Moore	Director	Yes	Founding employee; NodePrime co-founder
Lauren Friedman Stat	Director	Yes	Former Time Warner executive
Alexandra Schiff	Director	Yes	Legal and finance expertise
Spencer Rascoff	Director	Yes	Zillow co-founder and former CEO

---

Business Model Visual

---

Dividends & Upcoming Events

Dividend Information

Metric	Value
Current Dividend	$0.00
Dividend Yield	0.0%
Payout Ratio	N/A
Dividend History	Never paid dividends

Note: Palantir does not pay dividends, reinvesting all earnings into growth initiatives.

Upcoming Events & Catalysts

Date	Event	Potential Impact
Q1 2026	FY 2025 Earnings	Growth trajectory validation
Ongoing	NATO Partnership Expansion	International government revenue growth
2026	Army Enterprise Agreement	$10B contract execution

---

PLTR vs Snowflake vs Databricks: Data Analytics Competitor Comparison 2026

Company	Ticker	Market Cap	Revenue	Gross Margin	P/E Ratio	ROIC
Palantir Technologies	PLTR	$428B	$2.9B	80%	375x	14%
Snowflake	SNOW	$52B	$3.4B	67%	N/A	Neg
Databricks	Private	$43B	$3B+	~75%	N/A	N/A
C3.ai	AI	$4B	$310M	58%	N/A	Neg
Datadog	DDOG	$45B	$2.5B	79%	85x	8%

Key Differentiators: Palantir’s unique position in defense/intelligence with Top Secret clearances and its proprietary “ontology” technology create barriers competitors cannot easily replicate. However, the extreme valuation premium versus peers is notable.

---

Visual Score Summary

---

Key Graham/Buffett/Munger Quotes Applied

“A great business at a fair price is superior to a fair business at a great price.” — Charlie Munger

Palantir is undoubtedly a great business with exceptional moat characteristics, but the current price demands perfection with no margin of safety.

“Price is what you pay, value is what you get.” — Warren Buffett

At 375x earnings and 28x Graham Number, investors are paying an extreme premium for Palantir’s growth potential.

“The margin of safety is always dependent on the price paid.” — Benjamin Graham

With a P/E ratio in the top 1% of all software companies and trading far above any reasonable intrinsic value estimate, there is essentially no margin of safety at current prices.

---

Detailed Analysis

Section A: CEO & Management (Score: 17/25)

“If you’re looking for a manager, you want someone intelligent, energetic, and moral. But if they don’t have the last one, you don’t want the first two.” — Charlie Munger

Criterion	Score	Evidence
A1. Integrity & Honesty	4/5	Karp has maintained consistent messaging about Palantir’s mission; refuses business from authoritarian regimes
A2. Track Record	4/5	Named The Economist’s 2024 CEO of the Year; transformed Palantir to GAAP profitability
A3. Capital Allocation	3/5	Conservative approach but limited acquisitions; heavy SBC expense historically
A4. Transparency	3/5	Standard disclosure but some criticism of opaque algorithm explanations
A5. Owner-Orientation	3/5	Mixed; sold $2B+ in stock in 2024 while maintaining voting control

Evidence:

• The Economist named Karp 2024 CEO of the Year for transforming Palantir into a profitable company (Fortune, May 2025)
• Karp holds a PhD in philosophy from Goethe University Frankfurt; emphasizes ethical considerations in platform deployment (Wikipedia)
• Sold over $2 billion in stock during 2024, with $1.4 billion around the presidential election (Fortune, Feb 2025)

---

Section B: Board of Directors (Score: 12/20)

Criterion	Score	Evidence
B1. Business Savvy	4/5	Peter Thiel (PayPal), Spencer Rascoff (Zillow) bring proven entrepreneurial experience
B2. Personal Financial Stake	4/5	Founders collectively hold significant equity; Thiel owns ~3% worth $11B+
B3. Independence	2/5	Only 4 of 7 directors are independent; founder-controlled through Class F shares
B4. Shareholder Representation	2/5	Founder voting trust ensures 49.99% control regardless of share sales; limits shareholder voice

Evidence:

• Peter Thiel holds 70.9M shares (3.1%) worth approximately $11.4B (TIKR)
• Class F shares give founders 49.999999% voting control in perpetuity (TechCrunch, Aug 2020)
• Independent directors include Moore, Schiff, Stat, and Rascoff; Thiel is non-independent Chairman (SEC Filing)

---

Section C: Incentive Structures (Score: 14/20)

“Show me the incentive and I’ll show you the outcome.” — Charlie Munger

Criterion	Score	Evidence
C1. Long-term Performance Metrics	4/5	New SAR grants with $50 strike require 5-year vest; Karp’s original options have 10-year vesting
C2. Management Stock Ownership	4/5	Karp owns ~2.5% including all share classes; significant skin in the game
C3. Alignment with Shareholders	3/5	Stock-based but founder voting control creates asymmetric alignment
C4. No Perverse Short-term Incentives	3/5	Minimal cash bonus; but consistent selling pattern raises questions

Evidence:

• Karp received minimal cash compensation ($1.1M salary) with compensation tied to stock performance (Fortune, May 2025)
• New Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) granted in Q1 2024 require $50 share price and 5-year tenure (Palantir Bullets)
• Original Karp options have 10-year vesting schedule, longer than typical 3-year vesting (Fortune, May 2025)

---

Section D: Regulatory & Political Environment (Score: 18/25)

Criterion	Score	Evidence
D1. Political/Regulatory Moat	4/5	Deep DOD relationships; Top Secret clearances create barriers
D2. Government Relationship Sustainability	4/5	$10B Army contract; NATO partnership; bipartisan federal support
D3. No Corruption/Bribery	4/5	No FCPA violations found; clean regulatory record
D4. Antitrust Exposure	4/5	Low antitrust risk in fragmented market
D5. Regulatory Tailwinds/Headwinds	2/5	Privacy concerns from ACLU; ICE contract criticism; NHS contract controversy

Evidence:

• $10 billion Army Enterprise Agreement awarded July 2025 (CNBC, Aug 2025)
• Maven Smart System contract raised to $1.3B through 2029 (DefenseScoop, May 2025)
• Lobbying spending grew to $5.7M in 2024, approaching major defense contractors (OpenSecrets)
• ACLU criticism: software enables “true totalitarian nightmare” mass surveillance (LinkedIn)

---

Section E: Business Quality & Moat (Score: 29/35)

“The best moats are those that would take decades and billions of dollars to replicate.” — Charlie Munger

Criterion	Score	Evidence
E1. Sustainable Competitive Advantage	5/5	Unique ontology technology; 20+ years of development; 3,400+ patents
E2. Pricing Power	4/5	Top 20 customers average $64.6M annually (up from $54.6M); expanding deal sizes
E3. High Barriers to Entry	5/5	Top Secret clearances; decades of government relationship-building
E4. Low Threat of Disruption	4/5	Deep integration makes disruption costly; but hyperscaler competition exists
E5. Industry Structure	4/5	Favorable consolidation; niche defense market with limited competitors
E6. IP & Brand Value	4/5	Strong defense brand; 3,400+ patents; proprietary ontology
E7. Earnings Predictability	3/5	Growing recurring revenue; 120% net retention; but government contracts can be lumpy

Evidence:

• Switching costs estimated at $2.5M-$7.5M per enterprise client with 6-9 month transition periods (MLQ Research)
• 98% customer retention rate reported in 2024; 120% net dollar retention (Palantir Q4 2024 Business Update)
• 3,400+ patents protect proprietary technology (Klover)
• U.S. commercial revenue grew 64% YoY in Q4 2024 to $214M (Palantir IR)

---

Section F: Financial Strength & Capital Efficiency (Score: 28/35)

“The ideal business earns very high returns on capital and can reinvest at those high returns.” — Warren Buffett

Criterion	Score	Evidence
F1. Conservative Debt Levels	5/5	Zero long-term debt; net cash position
F2. Strong Credit Rating	4/5	No debt means no credit rating needed; strong implied creditworthiness
F3. Adequate Cash Reserves	5/5	$5.2B cash and short-term treasuries; covers years of operations
F4. No Aggressive Accounting	4/5	Clean audits; no restatements found; standard SBC treatment
F5. ROIC	3/5	ROIC of 13.5% (2024); improving but not exceptional; above WACC
F6. FCF Generation	4/5	$1.14B FCF in 2024 (+64% YoY); strong conversion
F7. Capital Allocation	3/5	Conservative approach; limited M&A; heavy SBC historically

Evidence:

• Zero debt with $5.2B cash position as of December 2024 (StockAnalysis)
• Free cash flow of $1.141B in 2024, up 64% from $697M in 2023 (MacroTrends)
• Gross margin of 80%; operating margin improved to 10.8% in 2024 (MacroTrends)
• Current ratio of 5.96x indicates exceptional liquidity (GuruFocus)

---

Section G: Country & Geopolitical Risk (Score: 13/15)

Criterion	Score	Evidence
G1. Rule of Law Jurisdictions	5/5	66% U.S., 11% UK; >77% from developed Western markets
G2. Limited Geopolitical Exposure	4/5	Minimal China/Russia exposure; NATO-aligned customer base
G3. Supply Chain Diversification	4/5	Software business with limited supply chain risk; cloud infrastructure diversified

Evidence:

• 66% of revenue from U.S., 11% from UK, 23% from rest of world (StockDividendScreener)
• NATO partnership expands to 32 member nations (Motley Fool, Apr 2025)
• No significant operations in high-risk jurisdictions; refuses business from authoritarian regimes

---

Section H: PLTR Intrinsic Value, Valuation & Margin of Safety (Score: 10/35)

“In the short run, the market is a voting machine but in the long run, it is a weighing machine.” — Benjamin Graham

Criterion	Score	Evidence
H1. P/E vs Historical Average	1/5	P/E of 375x vs 5-year average of 107x; trading at 3.5x historical average
H2. P/FCF	1/5	P/FCF of 288x; worse than 96% of software industry
H3. EV/EBITDA vs Sector	1/5	EV/EBITDA of 481x; extreme premium to sector
H4. PEG Ratio	2/5	PEG of 4.2x; above 3.0 threshold for overvaluation
H5. P/B Ratio	1/5	P/B of 74x vs median of 15x; near all-time high
H6. Graham Number	1/5	Trading at 28x Graham Number ($6.31); significantly overvalued
H7. Margin of Safety	3/5	No margin of safety; multiple valuation models suggest 80%+ overvaluation

Evidence:

• P/E ratio of 375x as of January 2026; historical median of 56.86 (MacroTrends)
• Graham Number of $6.31 vs stock price of ~$177 = 28x premium (GuruFocus)
• Intrinsic value estimates range from $5.29 to $55.46 using DCF and Graham methods (Alpha Spread)
• P/FCF of 288x ranked worse than 96% of 1,553 software companies (GuruFocus)

---

Section J: Benjamin Graham Defensive Investor Screen

Graham's 7-Point Criteria

#	Criterion	Threshold	Current Value	Pass/Fail
1	Adequate Size	Market Cap > $2B	$428B	✅
2	Strong Financial Condition	Current Ratio ≥ 2.0	5.96	✅
3	Earnings Stability	Positive EPS 10 consecutive years	2 years	❌
4	Dividend Record	Dividends 20+ years	0 years	❌
5	Earnings Growth	EPS growth ≥ 33% over 10 years	N/A (IPO 2020)	❌
6	Moderate P/E Ratio	P/E ≤ 15	375	❌
7	Moderate P/B Ratio	P/B ≤ 1.5 or (P/E × P/B) ≤ 22.5	74 (P/E × P/B = 27,750)	❌
TOTAL		7 to pass	2/7	❌ FAIL

Graham Number Analysis

NCAV Analysis

---

Red Flag Analysis

Governance Red Flags

Red Flag	Present?	Deduction	Evidence
Unrealistic promises	No	0	Guidance consistently met or exceeded
Excessive CEO compensation (>100x median)	No	0	Mostly stock-based; reasonable cash salary
Related-party transactions	No	0	None identified
Accounting restatements	No	0	Clean audit history
High CFO/auditor turnover	No	0	Stable management team
Reluctance on tough questions	No	0	Standard earnings call transparency
Corruption/bribery (FCPA)	No	0	No violations found
Governance Subtotal		0

Financial Red Flags

Red Flag	Present?	Deduction	Evidence
High leverage (Debt/EBITDA > 4x)	No	0	Zero debt
ROIC below WACC (5yr avg)	No	0	ROIC 13.5% > WACC
Declining FCF (3 consecutive years)	No	0	FCF growing strongly
Net share issuance >2% annually	No	0	Dilution normalized to ~4%
Gross margin declining >500bps	No	0	Stable at 80%
Financial Subtotal		0

Business Risk Red Flags

Red Flag	Present?	Deduction	Evidence
Customer concentration >25%	No	0	No single customer >25%
Single-country exposure >50%	Yes	-3	66% U.S. revenue (but rule-of-law jurisdiction)
Revenue decline in 3+ years	No	0	Consistent growth since IPO
Subsidy dependence	No	0	No subsidies; contract-based revenue
Business Subtotal		-3

Valuation Red Flags

Red Flag	Present?	Deduction	Evidence
Stock >2x 5-year avg P/E	Yes	-3	P/E 375x vs avg 107x (3.5x)
P/FCF > 40	No	0	Already captured in valuation score
Trading >30% above fair value	No	0	Already captured in valuation score
Valuation Subtotal		-3

Red Flag Summary

Category	Deduction	Max
Governance	0	-35
Financial	0	-21
Business Risk	-3	-14
Valuation	-3	-13
TOTAL DEDUCTION	-6	-83

---

Final Verdict: Is PLTR a Quality Buy per Munger's Rubric?

Investment Thesis Summary

The Bull Case: Palantir represents one of the most defensible software businesses in the world. The company’s proprietary ontology technology, built over two decades, creates switching costs estimated at $2.5M-$7.5M per client. With 98% customer retention, $10 billion in new government contracts, and accelerating commercial adoption through its AIP platform, Palantir is positioned as the operating system for enterprise data and decision-making. The fortress balance sheet ($5.2B cash, zero debt) and 80% gross margins provide exceptional financial flexibility.

The Bear Case: The valuation defies conventional metrics. At 375x earnings, 74x book value, and 28x the Graham Number, Palantir is priced for perfection with zero margin of safety. The founder voting trust ensures perpetual control regardless of economic ownership, limiting shareholder rights. Concentrated insider selling ($4B+ by founders in 2024) signals that those closest to the company are reducing exposure at current prices. Privacy controversies and government contract dependency create headline and concentration risks.

Bottom Line: Palantir is a wonderful business at an unreasonable price. The score of 135/210 (64.3%) reflects excellent business quality (83%) and financial strength (80%) dragged down by extreme valuation (29%). Munger would likely appreciate the moat but balk at paying 375x earnings for any business.

Who Should Consider PLTR?

• Value Investors: No — Fails every traditional value metric by extreme margins
• Growth Investors: Cautiously — Must believe in sustained 40%+ growth for years to justify valuation
• Dividend Investors: No — Never paid dividends; no plans to start
• Long-term Holders: With Patience — Quality business, but entry point matters significantly

Price Considerations

Scenario	Entry Point	Rationale
Aggressive	Current (~$177)	Only if confident in 50%+ annual growth through 2030
Moderate	~$100 (45% pullback)	More reasonable 200x P/E; still premium valuation
Conservative	~$60 (65% pullback)	Closer to 100x P/E; aligns with historical average

“Price is what you pay, value is what you get.” — Warren Buffett

---

Frequently Asked Questions: PLTR Stock Analysis 2026

Is Palantir Technologies a good stock to buy in 2026?

Based on the Munger Quality Rubric evaluation, PLTR scores 135/210 (64.3%), earning a CAUTION rating. The company demonstrates exceptional business quality with 80% gross margins, $5.2B in cash, and a proprietary technology moat that creates high switching costs. However, the extreme valuation (375x P/E, 74x P/B) leaves no margin of safety. Investors should wait for a significant pullback before initiating positions.

What is Palantir's competitive moat?

Palantir’s competitive advantage stems from three primary sources: (1) its proprietary “ontology” technology that integrates disparate data sources into unified decision-making platforms, developed over 20+ years; (2) Top Secret/SCI security clearances that competitors cannot easily obtain; and (3) high switching costs ($2.5M-$7.5M per client with 6-9 month transitions). This moat scored 29/35 (83%) in our Business Quality analysis, indicating strong durability.

Is PLTR stock overvalued or undervalued?

At current prices, PLTR trades at 375x earnings and 74x book value—among the most expensive valuations in the software industry. Compared to its 5-year average P/E of 107x, the stock appears significantly overvalued. The Graham Number analysis suggests a fair value of approximately $6.31, versus a current price around $177. Our Valuation score of 10/35 (29%) reflects substantial overvaluation with no margin of safety.

Does Palantir pay dividends?

No, Palantir Technologies does not pay dividends and has never declared a dividend since its 2020 IPO. The company reinvests all earnings into growth initiatives, research and development, and platform expansion. Given its growth trajectory and capital allocation strategy, dividends are not expected in the near term.

What are the main risks of investing in PLTR?

The primary risks identified include: (1) Extreme valuation with P/E of 375x leaving no margin of safety if growth disappoints; (2) Concentrated insider selling with founders offloading $4B+ in stock during 2024; (3) Founder voting control through Class F shares limits shareholder influence; (4) Privacy and surveillance controversies from civil liberties organizations; and (5) U.S. revenue concentration at 66%. Our Red Flag analysis identified 2 concerns totaling -6 points in deductions.

How does Palantir compare to competitors?

In the data analytics sector, Palantir competes with Snowflake, Databricks, and C3.ai. Key differentiators include Palantir’s defense and intelligence focus (competitors lack security clearances), its operational ontology versus data warehousing approaches, and its 80% gross margin leadership. However, Palantir trades at ~150x its competitors’ valuations, making it the most expensive option in the space.

---

Related Munger Quality Rubric Evaluations

Technology Sector

• Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) Evaluation — Score: 173/210 (82.4%) 🟢 PASS
• Meta Platforms (META) Evaluation — Score: 161/210 (76.7%) 🟢 PASS
• Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) Evaluation — Score: 166/210 (79.0%) 🟢 PASS

Similar Verdict (CAUTION)

• ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW) Evaluation — Score: 143/210 (68.1%) 🟡 CAUTION

Recently Evaluated

• Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) Evaluation — Score: 156/210 (74.3%) 🟢 PASS
• Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) Evaluation — Score: 151/210 (71.9%) 🟢 PASS

View All Evaluations →

---

Source Reliability & Citations

Source Summary

• Total Sources Used: 48
• HIGH Reliability: 38 (79%) — SEC filings, company IR, major financial news
• MEDIUM Reliability: 10 (21%) — Analyst reports, industry publications
• Sources Removed: 0 — All sources met reliability standards

Primary Sources (SEC Filings)

1. 10-K Annual Report FY 2024
2. DEF 14A Proxy Statement 2025
3. Q4 2024 Earnings Release

All Citations

1. Palantir Q4 2024 Business Update (Feb 2025)
2. MacroTrends – PLTR Financial Data (2024-2025)
3. SEC Form 10-K FY 2024
4. Fortune – Alex Karp Compensation (May 2025)
5. CNBC – $10B Army Contract (Aug 2025)
6. DefenseScoop – Maven Contract (May 2025)
7. TechCrunch – Voting Structure (Aug 2020)
8. OpenSecrets – Lobbying Data (2024)
9. GuruFocus – Valuation Metrics (2026)
10. StockAnalysis – Financial Ratios (2024)
11. Wikipedia – Alex Karp Biography
12. Wikipedia – Peter Thiel Biography
13. Bloomberg – Insider Trading Report (Feb 2025)
14. TIKR – Shareholder Analysis (2025)
15. Yahoo Finance – PLTR Statistics