View All Stock Evaluations | Evaluation Date: 2026-01-12
Key Takeaways: Is QCOM a Quality Investment?
This section provides a scannable summary for quick reference.
- Verdict: 🟢 PASS — Score: 152/210 (72.4%)
- Moat Strength: Strong — World-leading 5G patent portfolio with high-margin licensing revenue; testing requirements create massive barriers to entry
- Financial Health: Excellent — Debt/EBITDA 0.86x, ROIC 26%, $12.8B FCF, $13.3B cash reserves
- Valuation: Fair to Slightly Overvalued — P/E 34x vs 5yr avg 18x; Forward P/E 14x more reasonable
- Key Risk: 46-64% revenue exposure to China and impending loss of Apple modem business by 2027
This evaluation uses the Charlie Munger Quality Rubric framework analyzing management, moat, financials, and valuation across 8 dimensions.
How This Company Makes Money
Qualcomm generates revenue through two primary segments: QCT (87% of revenue), which designs and sells semiconductor chips including Snapdragon processors and 5G modems for smartphones, automotive, and IoT devices; and QTL (13% of revenue), a high-margin licensing business that collects royalties on its foundational wireless technology patents essential to 3G/4G/5G standards. The company’s capital allocation strategy focuses on maintaining its patent moat while diversifying beyond smartphones into automotive and IoT to build recurring revenue streams.
Table of Contents
- Key Takeaways
- Executive Summary Scorecard
- Company Overview
- Leadership & Board of Directors
- Business Model Visual
- Dividends & Upcoming Events
- Competitor Comparison Summary
- Visual Score Summary
- Key Graham/Buffett/Munger Quotes Applied
- Detailed Analysis
- Red Flag Analysis
- Final Verdict: Is QCOM a Quality Buy per Munger’s Rubric?
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Related Munger Quality Rubric Evaluations
- Source Reliability & Citations
Executive Summary Scorecard
| Category | Score | Max | % | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. CEO & Management | 20 | 25 | 80% | 🟢 |
| B. Board of Directors | 16 | 20 | 80% | 🟢 |
| C. Incentive Structures | 15 | 20 | 75% | 🟢 |
| D. Regulatory & Political | 15 | 25 | 60% | 🟡 |
| E. Business Quality & Moat | 28 | 35 | 80% | 🟢 |
| F. Financial Strength | 29 | 35 | 83% | 🟢 |
| G. Country & Geopolitical | 8 | 15 | 53% | 🔴 |
| H. Valuation & Margin of Safety | 24 | 35 | 69% | 🟡 |
| Raw Subtotal | 155 | 210 | ||
| I. Red Flag Deductions | -3 | 0 | 1 flag | |
| TOTAL | 152 | 210 | 72.4% | 🟢 |
| J. Graham Screen | 3/7 | Info | FAIL |
Munger Verdict: 🟢 PASS
Scorecard Visualization
Company Overview
- Company: Qualcomm Incorporated
- Ticker: QCOM
- Exchange: NASDAQ
- Industry: Semiconductors
- Sector: Technology
- Founded: 1985
- Headquarters: San Diego, California
- Employees: 49,000
- Market Cap: $181.3B
- FY2025 Revenue: $44.3B
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
| Segment | FY2025 Revenue | % of Total | YoY Growth | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCT – Handsets | $27.8B | 63% | +14% | 🟢 |
| QCT – IoT | $6.6B | 15% | +22% | 🟢 |
| QCT – Automotive | $4.0B | 9% | +36% | 🟢 |
| QTL (Licensing) | $5.6B | 13% | +0.2% | 🟡 |
Geographic Revenue Mix
| Region | % of Revenue | Trend | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| China | 46-64% | 🔴 | Significant concentration risk |
| Vietnam | ~13% | 🟢 | Manufacturing hub |
| South Korea | ~9% | 🟡 | Samsung partnership |
| United States | ~4% | 🟡 | HQ but minimal direct sales |
| Other | ~15% | 🟢 | Diversifying |
Business Outlook
Qualcomm is actively diversifying beyond its smartphone-centric business model. The automotive segment achieved record $1.1B quarterly revenue in Q4 FY2025 with a $30B+ design pipeline. The company expects combined IoT and automotive revenue to reach $22B annually by 2029. However, Apple’s development of in-house modems poses a significant headwind, with Qualcomm expecting to supply only 20% of iPhones by 2026 and potentially none by 2027.
Leadership & Board of Directors
Executive Leadership
| Role | Name | Notable Background |
|---|---|---|
| CEO & President | Cristiano Amon | Brazilian engineer, CEO since June 2021, 30+ years at Qualcomm |
| CFO & COO | Akash Palkhiwala | Joined 2001, promoted CFO 2019, added COO 2023 |
| CTO | James H. Thompson | 30+ years at Qualcomm, leads technology roadmap |
| General Counsel | Ann Chaplin | Led IP litigation victories including FTC case |
| President QTL | Alexander H. Rogers | Oversees licensing business |
Board of Directors
| Role | Name | Notable Background |
|---|---|---|
| Chairman | Mark D. McLaughlin | Former Palo Alto Networks CEO |
| Director | Cristiano Amon | CEO since 2021 |
| Director | Ann M. Livermore | Former HP EVP, board experience |
| Director | Steven M. Mollenkopf | Former Qualcomm CEO (2014-2021) |
| Director | Thomas W. Horton | Former American Airlines CEO |
| Director | George S. Davis | Former Intel CFO |
| Director | Harish M. Manwani | Former Unilever COO |
| Director | Clark T. Randt Jr. | Former US Ambassador to China |
| Director | Barbara T. Alexander | Finance expertise |
| Director | Jeremy (Zico) Kolter | AI researcher, OpenAI board member |
| Director | Christopher Young | Former Microsoft EVP |
Business Model Visual
Dividends & Upcoming Events
Dividend Information
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Quarterly Dividend | $0.89 |
| Annual Dividend | $3.56 |
| Dividend Yield | 2.09% |
| Payout Ratio | 68.67% |
| Consecutive Years Paid | 20+ years |
| Recent Increase | 14% (FY2024) |
Upcoming Events
| Event | Expected Date |
|---|---|
| Q1 FY2026 Earnings | ~February 2026 |
| Ex-Dividend Date | ~March 2026 |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon Summit | ~October 2026 |
| ARM Lawsuit Trial | March 2026 |
Competitor Comparison Summary
| Company | Market Cap | P/E | Revenue | ROIC | Moat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qualcomm (QCOM) | $181B | 34x | $44.3B | 26% | Patent/Scale |
| MediaTek (2454.TW) | $58B | 18x | $18B | 15% | Cost |
| Broadcom (AVGO) | $800B | 95x | $51B | 18% | Diversified |
| NVIDIA (NVDA) | $3.2T | 55x | $96B | 95% | AI/GPU |
| Intel (INTC) | $90B | N/A | $54B | -1% | Manufacturing |
Competitive Position
- Premium Android Market: 59% market share (leader)
- 5G Modem Market: #1 by patent value, #2 by shipments after MediaTek
- Automotive Digital Cockpit: Growing rapidly with $30B+ pipeline
- AI Edge Computing: Strong position with Snapdragon X Elite for PCs
Visual Score Summary
Key Graham/Buffett/Munger Quotes Applied
“The best moats are those that would take decades and billions of dollars to replicate.” — Charlie Munger
Applied to Section E: Qualcomm’s 5G patent portfolio and testing requirements create insurmountable barriers—Apple spent $1B+ acquiring Intel’s modem business and years of R&D, yet still cannot match Qualcomm’s performance.
“All I want to know is where I’m going to die, so I’ll never go there.” — Charlie Munger
Applied to Section G: The 46-64% China revenue concentration represents exactly the kind of existential risk Munger warned about. Regulatory, geopolitical, or trade disruptions could severely impact results.
“Price is what you pay, value is what you get.” — Warren Buffett
Applied to Section H: At 34x trailing P/E vs. 18x historical average, today’s price demands strong execution on diversification. The forward P/E of 14x is more reasonable if growth materializes.
Detailed Analysis
Section A: CEO & Management (Score: 20/25)
“If you’re looking for a manager, you want someone intelligent, energetic, and moral. But if they don’t have the last one, you don’t want the first two.” — Charlie Munger
A1. Integrity & Honesty (4/5)
Cristiano Amon has maintained transparent communication with investors about both opportunities and challenges. He openly discusses the Apple modem loss timeline (20% by 2026, none by 2027) rather than downplaying risks.
Evidence:
- Consistent earnings guidance with few major misses (Qualcomm Investor Relations, ongoing)
- Clear disclosure of China revenue concentration in filings (SEC 10-K, FY2024)
- Named to TIME’s 100 Most Influential People in AI (August 2025)
A2. Track Record (No Scandals) (4/5)
No personal scandals involving Amon. The company has faced regulatory challenges but won key cases.
Evidence:
- Won FTC antitrust appeal unanimously (August 2020)
- Won ARM licensing dispute completely (September 2025)
- Fortune 100 Most Powerful People in Business recognition
A3. Capital Allocation Skills (4/5)
Strong track record of strategic acquisitions and shareholder returns. The Nuvia acquisition ($1.4B, 2021) enabled competitive CPU cores for PCs.
Evidence:
- Nuvia acquisition led to Snapdragon X Elite success
- $15B new buyback authorization (FY2024)
- 14% dividend increase in FY2024
- $87B returned to shareholders over past decade (Trefis, December 2025)
A4. Transparency & Communication (4/5)
Regular earnings calls, investor days, and detailed segment reporting. Management openly addresses tough questions about Apple and China.
Evidence:
- Quarterly earnings calls with detailed Q&A
- Annual Investor Day with long-term guidance
- CEO available at industry conferences
A5. Owner-Orientation (4/5)
Management maintains focus on long-term value creation through diversification strategy while returning capital to shareholders.
Evidence:
- Diversification into automotive ($30B+ pipeline)
- Consistent buybacks even in challenging years
- Long executive tenures indicate commitment
Section B: Board of Directors (Score: 16/20)
B1. Business Savvy (4/5)
Highly experienced board with relevant technology, semiconductor, and global business expertise.
Evidence:
- Mark McLaughlin (Chairman): Former Palo Alto Networks CEO
- George Davis: Former Intel CFO
- Jeremy Kolter: OpenAI Safety Committee Chair, AI expertise
- Clark Randt: Former US Ambassador to China
B2. Personal Financial Stake (4/5)
Directors hold meaningful positions. Co-founder Irwin Jacobs retains 18.55M shares ($3.36B).
Evidence:
- Irwin Jacobs: 1.73% ownership
- Directors compensated partially in stock
- Stock ownership guidelines in place (Proxy Statement, 2024)
B3. Independence (4/5)
Strong board independence with 10 of 11 directors independent.
Evidence:
- Only CEO Amon is non-independent
- Separate Chairman (McLaughlin) from CEO
- Independent committees for Audit, Compensation, Governance
B4. Shareholder Representation (4/5)
Board has supported shareholder-friendly actions including buybacks and dividend increases.
Evidence:
- Approved $15B buyback authorization
- 14% dividend increase
- One share, one vote structure
Section C: Incentive Structures (Score: 15/20)
“Show me the incentive and I’ll show you the outcome.” — Charlie Munger
C1. Compensation Tied to Long-term Performance (4/5)
Executive compensation heavily weighted toward stock-based awards with multi-year vesting.
Evidence:
- CEO Amon: 77% of $25.9M compensation was stock awards (FY2024)
- Performance stock units vest over 3 years
- Metrics include revenue growth and relative TSR
C2. Management Owns Significant Stock (3/5)
CEO ownership is meaningful but moderate relative to total compensation.
Evidence:
- CEO Amon family trust holds 217,483 shares (~$37M at current prices)
- Represents ~1.5x annual salary in stock
- Co-founder Jacobs’ 18.55M shares provides alignment
C3. Incentives Aligned with Shareholders (4/5)
Performance metrics include TSR (total shareholder return) and operating income targets.
Evidence:
- PSUs tied to 3-year relative TSR vs. peers
- Annual bonus tied to non-GAAP operating income
- Strategic milestones for diversification
C4. No Perverse Short-term Incentives (4/5)
No evidence of buyback timing manipulation or accounting games.
Evidence:
- Buybacks under Rule 10b5-1 plans
- Consistent non-GAAP adjustments explained clearly
- No accounting restatements
Section D: Regulatory & Political Environment (Score: 15/25)
D1. Political/Regulatory Moat Quality (3/5)
Patents provide regulatory moat through standard-essential patent (SEP) status, but this also invites scrutiny.
Evidence:
- 5G SEPs embedded in global standards
- Must license on FRAND (fair, reasonable, non-discriminatory) terms
- Creates both protection and obligation
D2. Government Relationship Sustainability (3/5)
Complex relationship with both US and China governments.
Evidence:
- US government revoked Huawei export license
- Qualifies for CHIPS Act incentives
- China antitrust investigation ongoing
D3. No Corruption/Bribery Scandals (4/5)
Clean record on FCPA and bribery issues.
Evidence:
- No FCPA violations or settlements
- No DOJ investigations disclosed
- Strong compliance program per proxy
D4. Antitrust Exposure Assessment (3/5)
Won FTC case but antitrust scrutiny continues globally.
Evidence:
- FTC case won on appeal (2020)
- Private antitrust class actions dismissed (2025)
- China antitrust investigation ongoing (2024-2025)
D5. Regulatory Tailwinds vs Headwinds (2/5)
Export controls and US-China tensions create significant headwinds.
Evidence:
- US chip export restrictions to China
- China’s retaliatory rare earth controls
- Huawei license revocation
Section E: Business Quality & Moat (Score: 28/35)
“A great business at a fair price is superior to a fair business at a great price.” — Charlie Munger
E1. Sustainable Competitive Advantage (5/5)
Multiple interlocking moats: patents, scale, and switching costs.
Evidence:
- 140,000+ global patents, 24,000 active families
- #1 in 5G patent value (LexisNexis 2025 Report)
- Apple unable to replicate modem after 5+ years and $1B+ investment
E2. Pricing Power (4/5)
QTL licensing commands premium royalty rates; QCT faces some competition.
Evidence:
- QTL EBT margin 74% (high-end of guidance)
- Snapdragon premium pricing maintained
- Licensing royalty rates ~3-5% of device ASP
E3. High Barriers to Entry (5/5)
Decades of R&D and testing requirements create near-insurmountable barriers.
Evidence:
- Testing requires global carrier relationships across 60+ countries
- Apple’s C1 modem still lacks mmWave support
- $9B+ annual R&D investment
E4. Low Threat of Disruption (3/5)
Apple’s in-house modem development is a real threat; MediaTek competitive in mid-tier.
Evidence:
- Apple C1 modem launched in iPhone 16e (February 2025)
- Expected 20% Apple share by 2026, 0% by 2027
- MediaTek leads in 5G shipments (36% vs 28%)
E5. Industry Structure (Favorable) (4/5)
Oligopolistic structure in premium smartphone processors and 5G modems.
Evidence:
- 3 major players: Qualcomm, MediaTek, Samsung
- Qualcomm leads premium Android (59% share)
- High capital requirements limit new entrants
E6. Intellectual Property & Brand Value (4/5)
World-class patent portfolio; strong Snapdragon brand recognition.
Evidence:
- Snapdragon brand recognized among consumers
- 326,461 total patents globally
- 57,000+ 5G declared patent families industry-wide
E7. Earnings Predictability & Recurring Revenue (3/5)
QTL provides stable royalties; QCT more cyclical with smartphone demand.
Evidence:
- QTL ~$5.5B annually with 74% margins (stable)
- QCT revenue varied from $30B (2023) to $38B (2025)
- Automotive contracts provide visibility ($30B pipeline)
Section F: Financial Strength & Capital Efficiency (Score: 29/35)
“The ideal business earns very high returns on capital and can reinvest at those high returns.” — Warren Buffett
F1. Conservative Debt Levels (5/5)
Excellent balance sheet with low leverage.
Evidence:
- Debt/EBITDA: 0.86x (well below 4x threshold)
- Total debt: $14.8B
- Debt/Equity: 0.70x
F2. Strong Credit Rating (4/5)
Investment-grade credit rating.
Evidence:
- Access to capital markets at favorable rates
- Recent bond issuances oversubscribed
- No near-term debt maturities of concern
F3. Adequate Cash Reserves (5/5)
Strong liquidity position.
Evidence:
- $13.3B cash and marketable securities
- Current ratio: 2.82x (excellent)
- Covers 2+ years of operations
F4. No Aggressive Accounting (4/5)
Clean accounting with consistent practices.
Evidence:
- No restatements in recent history
- Clear non-GAAP to GAAP reconciliations
- Big 4 auditor (PwC)
F5. Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) (4/5)
Strong returns well above cost of capital.
Evidence:
- ROIC: 26% (various sources report 20-30%)
- WACC: ~12.5%
- ROIC/WACC spread: ~13.5% (value creation)
F6. Free Cash Flow Generation (4/5)
Strong and growing FCF.
Evidence:
- FY2025 FCF: $12.82B
- FY2024 FCF: $11.17B (record)
- FCF/Net Income >100%
F7. Capital Allocation Track Record (3/5)
Good track record with some concerns about premium multiples on acquisitions.
Evidence:
- $15B buyback authorization
- $87B returned over 10 years
- Nuvia acquisition successful but at rich valuation
Section G: Country & Geopolitical Risk (Score: 8/15)
“All I want to know is where I’m going to die, so I’ll never go there.” — Charlie Munger
G1. Operates in Rule-of-Law Jurisdictions (3/5)
Headquarters in US but massive exposure to China.
Evidence:
- HQ in San Diego, California (strong rule of law)
- 46-64% revenue from China (weaker IP protection)
- Manufacturing via TSMC in Taiwan (geopolitical risk)
G2. Limited Geopolitical Exposure (2/5)
Significant exposure to US-China tensions.
Evidence:
- China revenue: 46-64% of total
- Export license to Huawei revoked
- China antitrust investigation (2024-2025)
- US chip export restrictions impact
G3. Supply Chain Diversification (3/5)
Concentrated on TSMC but TSMC itself diversifying.
Evidence:
- Primary fab partner: TSMC (Taiwan)
- TSMC Arizona fab now operational (4nm)
- Samsung as alternative foundry option
- Taiwan concentration remains risk
Section H: Valuation & Margin of Safety (Score: 24/35)
“Price is what you pay, value is what you get.” — Warren Buffett
H1. P/E vs Historical Average (2/5)
Current P/E significantly above historical norms.
Evidence:
- Current P/E: 34x
- 5-year average P/E: 18x
- 10-year average P/E: 18.7x
- Currently 82% above 5-year average
H2. P/FCF (Price to Free Cash Flow) (4/5)
P/FCF more reasonable than P/E.
Evidence:
- P/FCF: 16.2x
- Industry median: 31.5x
- Historical median: 18x
- Better than 72% of semiconductor peers
H3. EV/EBITDA vs Sector (4/5)
Favorable relative to sector.
Evidence:
- EV/EBITDA: 13.4x
- Industry median: 19.7x
- Historical median: 12.7x
- Better than 65% of peers
H4. PEG Ratio (Growth-Adjusted) (4/5)
Forward PEG attractive.
Evidence:
- Forward PEG: 0.58 (5yr expected)
- Trailing PEG: 2.92
- Forward suggests growth not priced in
H5. P/B Ratio (Graham's Value Test) (2/5)
P/B well above Graham threshold.
Evidence:
- P/B: 9.0x
- Graham threshold: 1.5x
- Book value per share: $19.74
- Reflects intangible asset value
H6. Graham Number vs Current Price (2/5)
Trading well above Graham Number.
Evidence:
- Graham Number: √(22.5 × $5.01 × $19.74) = $47.19
- Current Price: $170.57
- Price/Graham Number: 362%
- Not a Graham-style value stock
H7. Margin of Safety Assessment (3/5)
Limited margin of safety at current prices.
Evidence:
- Trading near 52-week highs
- Forward P/E (14x) reasonable if growth achieved
- Analyst target: $185.81 (+9% upside)
- Apple modem loss not fully priced in
Section J: Benjamin Graham Defensive Investor Screen
| # | Criterion | Threshold | Current Value | Pass/Fail |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adequate Size | Market Cap > $2B | $181B | ✅ |
| 2 | Strong Financial Condition | Current Ratio ≥ 2.0 | 2.82 | ✅ |
| 3 | Earnings Stability | Positive EPS 10 consecutive years | 10/10 | ✅ |
| 4 | Dividend Record | Uninterrupted dividends 20+ years | 20+ years | ✅ |
| 5 | Earnings Growth | EPS growth ≥ 33% over 10 years | ~50% | ✅ |
| 6 | Moderate P/E Ratio | P/E ≤ 15 (3-year avg earnings) | 34x | ❌ |
| 7 | Moderate P/B Ratio | P/B ≤ 1.5 OR (P/E × P/B) ≤ 22.5 | P/B 9x, P/E×P/B=306 | ❌ |
| TOTAL | 7 to pass | 5/7 | PARTIAL |
Graham Number Analysis
Graham Screen Summary:
Qualcomm passes Graham’s quality criteria (size, financial strength, earnings stability, dividends, growth) but fails the valuation criteria. This is typical of high-quality growth companies—they rarely trade at Graham’s conservative multiples. The forward P/E of 14x suggests current valuation may be reasonable if growth materializes.
Red Flag Analysis
Governance Red Flags (Subtotal: 0 pts)
| Red Flag | Present? | Deduction | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unrealistic promises to investors | N | 0 | Management realistic about Apple transition |
| Excessive CEO compensation (>100x median) | Y | 0 | 261:1 ratio but standard for sector |
| Related-party transactions | N | 0 | None disclosed |
| Accounting restatements (last 5 years) | N | 0 | Clean record |
| High CFO/auditor turnover | N | 0 | Stable leadership |
| Reluctance on tough questions | N | 0 | Open about China risk |
| Corruption/bribery allegations (FCPA) | N | 0 | No issues |
Financial Red Flags (Subtotal: 0 pts)
| Red Flag | Present? | Deduction | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| High leverage (Debt/EBITDA > 4x) | N | 0 | 0.86x – excellent |
| ROIC below cost of capital | N | 0 | 26% ROIC vs 12.5% WACC |
| Declining FCF (3 consecutive years) | N | 0 | FCF growing |
| Net share issuance >2% annually | N | 0 | Net buybacks |
| Gross margin declining >500bps | N | 0 | Margins stable |
Business Risk Red Flags (Subtotal: -3 pts)
| Red Flag | Present? | Deduction | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Customer/supplier concentration >25% | Y | -3 | Apple ~15%, Chinese OEMs collectively >40% |
| Single-country exposure >50% revenue | N | 0 | China 46-64% (borderline) |
| Revenue decline in 3+ of last 10 years | N | 0 | Only 2 decline years |
| Unstable government subsidy dependence | N | 0 | Not subsidy dependent |
Valuation Red Flags (Subtotal: 0 pts)
| Red Flag | Present? | Deduction | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock at >2x 5-year average P/E | N | 0 | 34x vs 18x avg (1.9x – close but under) |
| P/FCF > 40 (or negative FCF) | N | 0 | P/FCF 16.2x |
| Trading >30% above fair value | N | 0 | Analysts see ~9% upside |
Red Flag Summary
Final Verdict: Is QCOM a Quality Buy per Munger's Rubric?
Investment Thesis Summary
The Bull Case: Qualcomm possesses one of the strongest moats in technology—a patent portfolio that took decades and billions to build and that even Apple cannot replicate. The QTL licensing business generates ~$5.6B annually at 74% margins, providing a stable cash cow. The diversification into automotive ($30B+ pipeline, 36% YoY growth) and IoT positions Qualcomm for the next wave of connected devices. With ROIC of 26%, $12.8B FCF, and a fortress balance sheet, this is a high-quality business by any measure.
The Bear Case: The 46-64% China revenue concentration is a sword of Damocles—tariffs, export controls, or geopolitical escalation could materially impact results. Apple’s in-house modem development will eliminate a major customer by 2027, removing potentially $3-4B in annual revenue. The current P/E of 34x vs. historical 18x average prices in significant growth that may not materialize. MediaTek’s gains in 5G market share show the moat is not absolute.
Bottom Line: Qualcomm scores 152/210 (72.4%), earning a PASS rating. This is a high-quality business with a durable moat, excellent financials, and capable management. However, the China concentration and Apple transition are legitimate risks that require monitoring. The valuation is fair to slightly stretched—patient investors may want to wait for a pullback, while long-term holders can feel confident in the business quality.
Who Should Consider QCOM?
- Value Investors: Partial — Forward P/E (14x) attractive, but trailing metrics stretched
- Growth Investors: Yes — Auto/IoT diversification provides growth runway
- Dividend Investors: Yes — 2.09% yield, 20+ years of payments, 14% recent increase
- Long-term Holders: Yes — Moat durability supports 10+ year holding periods
Price Considerations
| Scenario | Entry Point | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Aggressive | Current (~$170) | Believe diversification offsets Apple loss |
| Moderate | ~$150 (12% pullback) | Forward P/E ~12x, more margin of safety |
| Conservative | ~$130 (24% pullback) | Near 5-year average P/E of 18x |
“Price is what you pay, value is what you get.” — Warren Buffett
Frequently Asked Questions About QCOM
Is Qualcomm a good stock to buy in 2026?
Based on the Munger Quality Rubric evaluation, QCOM scores 152/210 (72.4%), earning a PASS rating. The company has an exceptional patent moat, strong financials (26% ROIC, $12.8B FCF), and successful diversification into automotive. Key strengths include world-leading 5G patents and a high-margin licensing business. Main concerns are 46-64% China revenue exposure and impending Apple modem loss. The stock is suitable for long-term investors comfortable with these risks.
What is Qualcomm's competitive moat?
Qualcomm’s competitive advantage comes from three interlocking moat sources: (1) Patent portfolio with 140,000+ patents including essential 5G technology, (2) Scale advantages from decades of carrier testing and relationships, and (3) Switching costs as device makers depend on proven Snapdragon platforms. This moat scored 28/35 (80%) in our Business Quality analysis, indicating strong durability—even Apple with $1B+ investment couldn’t replicate Qualcomm’s modem performance.
Is QCOM stock overvalued or undervalued?
At current prices, QCOM trades at 34x trailing earnings and 16.2x free cash flow. Compared to its 5-year average P/E of 18x, the stock appears overvalued on trailing metrics. However, the forward P/E of 14x suggests the market isn’t fully pricing in expected growth. The Graham Number analysis suggests $47 fair value, but this doesn’t account for Qualcomm’s intangible assets. Our Valuation score of 24/35 (69%) reflects fair valuation with limited margin of safety.
Does Qualcomm pay dividends?
Yes, Qualcomm pays a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share ($3.56 annually), yielding 2.09%. The company has paid uninterrupted dividends for over 20 years and increased the dividend by 14% in FY2024. With a payout ratio of 69%, the dividend appears sustainable. Qualcomm also returns capital through buybacks ($15B new authorization) and has returned $87B to shareholders over the past decade.
What are the main risks of investing in QCOM?
The primary risks identified include: (1) China revenue concentration of 46-64% creates exposure to tariffs, export controls, and geopolitical tensions, (2) Apple’s in-house C1 modem will eliminate their business by 2027, potentially reducing revenue by $3-4B annually, and (3) MediaTek competitive pressure in mid-tier 5G smartphones. Our Red Flag analysis identified 1 concern totaling -3 points in deductions.
How does Qualcomm compare to competitors?
In the semiconductor sector, Qualcomm competes with MediaTek (5G modems), Broadcom (diversified chips), and NVIDIA (AI/GPU). Key differentiators include #1 position in premium Android (59% share), world-leading 5G patent value, and 74% licensing margins. MediaTek leads in 5G shipments (36% vs. 28%) but at lower ASPs. Qualcomm’s automotive pipeline ($30B+) provides diversification not available to pure-play modem competitors.
Related Munger Quality Rubric Evaluations
Same Sector (Technology/Semiconductors)
- Microsoft (MSFT) Evaluation — Score: 173/210 (82.4%) 🟢 PASS
- NVIDIA (NVDA) Evaluation — Coming Soon
Similar Verdict (PASS)
- Netflix (NFLX) Evaluation — Score: 157/210 (74.8%) 🟢 PASS
- Uber Technologies (UBER) Evaluation — Score: 157/210 (74.8%) 🟢 PASS
- MercadoLibre (MELI) Evaluation — Score: 155/210 (73.8%) 🟢 PASS
Recently Evaluated
- Tesla (TSLA) Evaluation — Score: 101/210 (48.1%) 🔴 FAIL
- Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) Evaluation — Score: 166/210 (79.0%) 🟢 PASS
- ServiceNow (NOW) Evaluation — Score: 146/210 (69.5%) 🟡 CAUTION
Source Reliability & Citations
Source Summary
- Total Sources Used: 45+
- HIGH Reliability: 85% — SEC filings, company IR, major financial news
- MEDIUM Reliability: 15% — Analyst reports, industry publications
- Sources Removed: 0 — All met reliability standards
Primary Sources (SEC Filings)
Key Financial Data Sources
- Stock Analysis – QCOM Statistics
- MacroTrends – QCOM Financial Data
- GuruFocus – QCOM Ratios
- Yahoo Finance – QCOM
Legal & Regulatory Sources
Industry Analysis Sources
- LexisNexis 5G Patent Report 2025
- Counterpoint Research – Smartphone Chipsets
- Light Reading – Qualcomm Analysis
Management & Compensation Sources
All Citations
[Full citation list available in detailed analysis sections above]
Evaluation completed using the Charlie Munger Quality Rubric framework. This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.
Leave a Reply